How many radio pictures have you seen? We know about normal optical photos, X-ray photos, infrared photos, but radio photos are not very common. Why not?  Because radio cameras, having many ‘pixels’ are big and expensive.   For high resolution the camera need to be several wavelengths big and for many pixel, you need many coherent receivers.

Antenna Arrays are basically a radio camera, where you have many small receivers. You can see it as having a pixel per receiver. A normal radio receiver is equivalent to a single pixel camera. However, when you have an array with 100 receivers, you can form a 100 pixel radio image.

Astronomy example

You can still make a picture with a single receiver. Below is an image of the sky at 21 cm take by 2 ‘single pixel’ receivers, the the 100-m dish at Effelsberg/Germany and the 64-m Parkes/Australia telescope.

© HI4PI Collaboration

Note that this is an very expensive photo. It took thousands of hours of observation of two of the world’s largest radio telescopes. The telescope had to point to each position in the sky, one after the other.

Furthermore, the resolution is limited by the size of the telescope (Rayleigh criterion). The 100m telescope can not do better than about 0.1 degree resolution.


Is it possible to make a simple and inexpensive 100 element antenna array? The array should have very good sensitivity across the SKA Mid-Frequency band (0.5-1.5 GHz). It must have a low costs per element (less than $50?) and make use of commercial-off-the-shelf hardware as far as possible. Note that $5000 may sound a lot for a 100 element array, but it is comparable or even cheaper than a steerable 2m radio dish, which only give you one pixel.

The design will be both open-source and open-hardware and made available on the downloads page.

The next posts will describe our efforts to reach this goal.

(Artists impression of a SKA aperture array. Credit: SKA Organisation)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *